TEXAS A&M +8 · EDGE loss; UNDER 56.5 · EDGE win. The full grades are below.
The verdict
SAT, SEP 26 · FINAL · TIGER STADIUM (LA)
Texas A&M2-149%
LSU2-151%
TA&MNATL RANKLSU
20th
Model Overall
52nd
34th
Model Offense
89th
20th
Model Defense
30th
0.6
Pace
-3.6
73%
Returning PPA
21%
Color marks the better value in each row.
Open total57.5
Model total51.3
TEXAS A&M +8 · EDGE LOSSUNDER 56.5 · EDGE WIN
Market cadence
Line movement
Latest: Texas A&M +8.0 · EDGE
◆Edge
▲Lean
○No signal
Sat, Sep 26, 11:04:31 AM ET
Texas A&M line
+8.0
Producer tier
EDGE
Fri, Sep 4, 5:03:41 PM ET; Texas A&M line +3.0; producer tier No signal
Tue, Sep 22, 11:02:45 AM ET; Texas A&M line +8.75; producer tier EDGE
Wed, Sep 23, 11:02:22 AM ET; Texas A&M line +8.5; producer tier EDGE
Thu, Sep 24, 11:02:22 AM ET; Texas A&M line +8.5; producer tier EDGE
Fri, Sep 25, 11:02:48 AM ET; Texas A&M line +8.75; producer tier EDGE
Sat, Sep 26, 11:04:31 AM ET; Texas A&M line +8.0; producer tier EDGE
RATINGS AS OF: TA&M wk 4 · LSU wk 4
Model margin
Texas A&M by 0.09
Opening line
Texas A&M +3
Latest line
Texas A&M +8.5
Close total
52.3
Graded model opinions
Every published Lean and Edge grades against its locked selected line. ATS and total results remain independent.
TA&M6
FINALTiger Stadium (LA)
LSU35
WinLSUWIN HIT
ATSTEXAS A&M +8 · EDGEEDGE MISS
TotalUNDER 56.5 · EDGEEDGE HIT
Where these numbers come from
One model scores every FBS game: a win probability, a projected margin, and a projected total, built from as-of team ratings (offense, defense, pace, returning production, recruiting). Ratings on this page are snapshots from the week shown, with zero future information baked in.
Leans and Edges use the exact lines published before kickoff. Every published pick is graded.
